Crankshaft options

Discussion in '1.8 & 1.8T' started by new2gti, Jun 3, 2022.

  1. new2gti New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2021
    Likes Received:
    4
    Hi all

    been looking at crankshaft options for my 1.8t rebuild

    I’ve seen the ALH from the tdi and ALT mentioned here

    On vortex they mention a few other forged options that could be used

    BPY
    BMP
    AXW
    BMB
    AWA
    CDLC
    CDLF
    CDLG
    CZRA

    which opens the market up a bit

    preferred route is to max out displacement (unless there’s a reason not too)

    I know the ALH will give me that but not sure of the others

    Also google a minefield of crankshafts, does anyone know the part number for the ALH

    Cheers all
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2022
  2. Toyotec

    Toyotec CGTI Committee - Happy helper at large Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Likes Received:
    3,321
    Location:
    Creating Pfredstarke
    You need to be more specific with what you want to achieve with your 1.8T?

    Just googling and reading more opinion on forums will only confuse you more. At least you tried though.
     
  3. new2gti New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2021
    Likes Received:
    4
    Thanks for the reply

    Looking to build a 2.1 stroker from the ground up with an agu lump that I have

    I have mk4 mot fail that I bought for the build knowing the engine is good

    I have a mk2 3 door it will be going in for fast road and straight line use

    I have a mk3 tank, lines, wiring

    Will need management that I haven’t decided on yet

    Engine wise I’m starting with the block, crankshaft - bearings - rods -pistons and associated machine work

    Looking to get the right crank decided for maximum displacement and the rest to follow

    As you say there’s lots of info out there
     
  4. Tristan

    Tristan Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Likes Received:
    1,210
    Location:
    Southern IRELAND
    Why do you need to go stroker?
    Are you chasing huge power?
     
  5. PhilRyder

    PhilRyder Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2020
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Surrey
    Why would you not if building from ground up? I would [:D] POWERRRRRRRRRR! :lol:
     
  6. new2gti New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2021
    Likes Received:
    4
    Am I looking for power, In a word, yes :lol:

    haven’t got a fixed goal at this point but what I do want to do future proof the bottom end for added power gains

    initially it’ll be bottom end build - gas flowed head - bigger turbo- injectors and everything else that goes with that

    clutch and 02j gearbox build, will need lsd

    not sure on piggy back or stand alone management but I will need launch

    im open to suggestions regarding any part of the build

    there are very knowledgeable folks here :)

    for instance if it would better to go 2.0 instead of 2.1 then I’m all for that
     
  7. Tristan

    Tristan Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Likes Received:
    1,210
    Location:
    Southern IRELAND
    Tbh, without going stroker, especially if using an 02j as well, 350bhp os going to be more than enough, if not too much, for use on the road.
    I recently got a spin in a mk2 with 280 ish, 1.8t k04, with either 195 or 205 x 16s, and in the dry, tyres warm, it just turned rubber into smoke in the lower gears.

    Until the rods sh1t themselves... But that's another story.

    Unless you have easy access to the required bottom end bits, if it was myself, I'd be investing the time and funds in forged rods, pistons, a nice efficient turbo, good management, a nice LSD, suspension, brakes and sticky Tires.

    But I look forward to seeing yours.
     
    bri likes this.
  8. new2gti New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2021
    Likes Received:
    4
    Agree that 350 is more than enough for road use with fwd

    There is a question mark over straight line then, maybe using switchable maps could be the answer, this goes back to management - only want to fork out for it once so needs to be right


    tbh I’m keen on using a stroker

    main reason is that the block will need to be bored anyway which means stripping it out
    it’s a high miler so for piece of mind I’d get it done

    Soo keeping that in mind, looking for some crankshaft info :)
     
  9. danster Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Likes Received:
    15
    Only 350bhp? You could probably squeeze that out of an 8 valve if you're going to bolt on a talent compensating snail... :p

    It would save a load of cost and grief if you're considering going to a stroker and overbore build.
    I'm currently sorting out issues with a past but stupid Oettinger 16S engine "build" where someone thought boring to 83.5mm was a good idea...
    It left heehaw material to properly seal the headgasket. And that's on a naturally aspirated road car engine so lower cylinder pressures than would be seen with a higher output forced induction build that was gong to see hard use.

    VW cranks of either cast or forged hue are not known to fail much.
    You could source an 06X 2.0 8v such as an APK engine code out of a mk4 Golf as a base block and crank which would give 82.5mm bore and 92.8mm stroke. Select your forged rods and pistons to suit your spec. And you could swap the crank out for a TFSI forged one if you feel you must.
    IIRC the 2.0 8v APK block will need the head bolt holes resized as they use a slightly smaller diameter bolt than the 20v head uses.
    Using a TFSI block brings in issues with internal oil galleries what with the balancer shaft assembly and oil filter housing. The 2.0 8v APK just uses the std non balance shaft oil pump like the 06X 20 valve engines.
    Some of the 06X diesel cranks and petrol cranks differ in that the counterweights are on one cylinder's crank web. This is probably done to reduce internal pumping losses between cylinders 1&2 and 3&4 as those pistons reciprocate up and down their respective bores.
    Whether the counterweight lobe weights would effect over all engine balance / harmonics when not matched to same original weight piston rod combos well who knows. [:[]
     
    Toyotec, HPR and Tristan like this.
  10. Tristan

    Tristan Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Likes Received:
    1,210
    Location:
    Southern IRELAND
    Danster!!!

    I honestly, genuinely got a huge smile on my mug, seeing a post from Scotland's finest!
     
    HPR likes this.
  11. Toyotec

    Toyotec CGTI Committee - Happy helper at large Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Likes Received:
    3,321
    Location:
    Creating Pfredstarke
    Just understand, what you want to 'build' and your perception, may be two different ideologies. MK2 Golf also. Does not take a lot to accelerate that chassis.
    But you have explained yourself at least.

    Most folks who build "1.8T" strokers, do so for a eariler and faster build of torque. A 2.1 1.8t is not what folks build, unless you wish a to prove a point and pay to do so, for no benefit.

    A 1.8T can develop '500 ps' with the right turbo and associated headwork and parts, but you will also have to rev the engine, as the real important attribute - torque of about 550Nm or so at near 300kPa, will stablise from 5000 rpm to 7500 rpm. So you end up having to rev the engine to 8000 rpm. That means more cost into your build to ensure it stays togther.
    With a "stroker" 500 ps can also be achieved , with the turbo building same boost from 600 to 500 rpm earlier.
    The engine is overbored from 81mm to 82.5 mm, and a 92.8 mm TFSI crankshaft with used, with custom rods and stroker pistons.
    It will be more expensive than just a 1.8, even if you are doing the work yourself.
    A compromise would be to build a 1849 cc aka a "1.9" with 82.5 mm pistons. You keep your 1.9 crank.

    What I can say, is 550 Nm in MK2 Golf will require more supporting components, to keep the car safe as well as have traction.
    This is kind of build is not a simple through it together and see.

    Maybe if you have not undertaken such an extensive build as you are asking about, consider a refresh of the base engine and a smaller AET or Littco hybrid KKK turbo, keep it simple and 400Nm or so, and a car that is still savage.

    That is my 2p on the subject have done and tuned that sort of thing myself.
     
    erreesse likes this.
  12. HPR

    HPR Administrator Admin

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Likes Received:
    1,819
    A 95.5 mm diesel crank in a 220 mm bloc can be done ..but to me, its a stretch of limits.. pretty much as if you would go to large in bore....
    For a turbo engine...83.0 bore is as big you can go, to keep things on the safe side...to get a 1870 cc with the 86.4 mm crank.
    Altough if going for extreme power levels, then stay at 82.0 or 82.5 bore
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2022
    erreesse and Toyotec like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice