parkers says vr6 highline has better MPG than std VR6??

just looking on parkers as a change of plan might see me getting a mk3 VR6 as apposed to the mk2.

apparently the MPG or a highline is 32 against the standard VR6's 28 but the highline was just a trim surely.

 

Some people think they are more powerful but I don't.

 

i would've thought more thirstier tbh! they're top-of-the-range so have everything!! 2.9, leathers, a/c, etc. mustbe more weightier and with a/c???

 

VR6 highline isnt 2.9 thats the corrado VR6 surely well if it is parkers is wrong.

i would of thought the highline would guzzle more also. Im in the process of buying a VR6 so interested in the difference.

 

Same engine so how can it have better economy! The only difference really is 1 group on insurance

 

it's not just the highline, it's all the OBD2 engined cars (1005 on). they run a lot cleaner than the earlier ones, thus producing more power and are more fuel effiecient.

 

so is it best to look for a post 1997 odb2??? i heard the 2.9 rado TB and inlet mods are only available on the ODB1 though. I dont know much about VR's in the process of trying to buy one either selling teh mk2 or just blagging the parents and the uni loan ha ha.

 

regarding the insurance group its the same according to parkers and my insurance company highline was 32 notes more insurance that is.

not sure if i want the leather thou. im after a purple one and i definately dont want the matching purple leather its just not to my taste.

 

you cant get post 1997, that's when they stopped making VR6's.

 

ooops!! very sorry! i thought highlines had the 2.9s. i got it wrong!!

 

sorry i meant post 1995 is that the one im best looking for?

 

nah, 1996 - 1997 models ( (N ???)P & R plates only)

The MK2 was revised in early 1996 and its around then that the OBD2 system was introducted on the VR6.

 

mk3 you mean