what are the fundemental differences mechanically between these 2 cars?? aint bothered about trim and body work. cheers
3.2 litre engive v 2.8 241PS v 204PS 236 lb/ft v 199 lb/ft 153mph v 146mph top speed 6.6secs v 7.1secs 0-62mph 17.2mpg v 17.9mpg Urban 32.5mpg v 34.0mpg Extra Urban 24.2mpg v 25.4mpg Combined 62 litre petrol tank v 63 litres
so other than the engine theres not much a turbo and a decent set of FK's wouldnt sort??? hhhmmm very iiinteresting. got to be more in it than that tho surely
I think the interior and general equipment spec will be a lot different - oh and the r32 has a different body with flared arches. VW like to do that for some reason...
i have to say if mechanically they are so similar then thats quite dissapointing. chipping the V6 wouldnt leave you too far from the R32. anyone know how well they go with a chip, BHP and performance wise. and possibly with turbo and maybe capacity increase. what with there being anything upto 10k between them price wise it would be a bargin imho
A lot of the guys off uk-mkivs have had the AMD stage 2 remap on their R32 which includes Miltek exhaust and are seeing 260-270bhp. 0-60 times are low 6's as well apparently. Edited by: Golfgirl
Yeah but who wants a lard arsed car where they had to increase the engine output just to make it slower than the previously "fastest" VW? I'm just bitter that now I could possible aspire to buying a newish performance VW there isn't one. ie. I want a new Corrado VR6.
But the exclusivity makes up for that. And its not so much about outright power, but the peak torque is substantially lowered in the rpm range on the R32.