The truth about the VR6 Swap

Discussion in 'Mk2' started by shaz8389, Feb 10, 2010.

  1. shaz8389

    shaz8389 Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Likes Received:
    10
    That's something I didn't think of...

    The other issue is that I've driven a cable shift car and didn't like it.
     
  2. micky1 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Bath.
    Vr's are old hat.

    v6 2.8 / 3.2 / 3.6! 24v's are accesable finacially now and are a great engine, rev alot easier, make better power.

    ie owned two vr'd mk2's. one narrow, one wide, wide for the track, narrow for the scene!
     
  3. Mike_H Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2004
    Likes Received:
    17
    Location:
    iQuit
    At the track day at Cadwell in Nov, the Corrado VR went off on the warm up
    lap, and the light blue mk2 VR had a big off nose first. Both on a tight slippy bend. To be fair, other golfs also fell off, but not by ploughing on at a tight turn.

    I think you'll lose some of the snappy turn in of a mk2, but expect you could get some of it back with wider track and more castor.
     
  4. PhatVR6 Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    it's all bull. I've lost count of the amount of times I've said this.

    to get round a corner you NEED weight on the front wheels. otherwise they won't grip and you will plough straight on. usually this is done by braking right into the turn in point to load the front wheels up. with a vr the weight is already there, so do your braking first then ease off them as you turn in.

    also, most of the understeer problems are from the lack of getting the power down due to an open diff. 8v's and 16v's don't understeer as they simply do not produce enough power to overwhelm decent tyres.

    mk2 20v's have the same issues power understeer wise. if anything they are worse as the power delivery isn't as smoth and the torque is much higher at lower revs than a lazy vr is.

    My old blue corrado at cadwell only had a set of coilovers and some sticky yokos on the front. I was running rings around the GTI "race" cars.
     
  5. Deako Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    133
    Location:
    ReddiWraps
    That was the one from the Jetta Prof. I did another conversion in Jan 2005 into a Royal Blue Mk2 that had an ABF in already. I sold the car in Spring 2005 to Stef (Veedubber), think he still owns it. Bought a Passat VR6 donor car that had a brand new engine in it 40k miles ago for the conversion.
     
  6. gillm

    gillm ***** User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    yeovil somerset

    that blue mk2 was sweet , you were a fool to sell it lol .
     
  7. Deako Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    133
    Location:
    ReddiWraps
    I know......... [:^(]

    Edit: Just about to link some pics from Photobucket.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Best Mk2 i have ever owned!!!!!
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2010
  8. Deako Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    133
    Location:
    ReddiWraps
    1 more for old time sake.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Aphex Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Very nice, shame it had to go :thumbup:
     
  10. mikesdubs Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N Wales
    Why arn't mk1 vr6's as popular for fast road cars or even track cars, are they more difficult to convert? Does the handling become even more difficult to get right?
     
  11. RIP-MK3 Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    sunbury on thames
    probably because an ABF/KR conversion is so much easier, and in a ligthweight car like that 170+ bhp with a high revving engine is pretty quick anyway.
     
  12. StuMc

    StuMc Moderator and Regional Host - Manchester Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Likes Received:
    268
    Location:
    50? 20` 47 N - 06? 57` 57 E
    ^^^^ That, and it`s a bigger ball-ache to fit...
     
  13. gillm

    gillm ***** User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    yeovil somerset
    my old mk1 was having a vr dropped in it . too be fair it prob would have fallen out , rust bucket !
     
  14. micky1 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Bath.
    after being parked next to Big Ron's vr'd mk1@ e38 last year and taking a very long look at it theres loads of room especially on TB's
     
  15. shaz8389

    shaz8389 Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Likes Received:
    10
    From what I've gathered so far, cost to cost, you can get the most power in a VR swapped Mk2, which is good if I'm wanting to stay on a fair budget and wanting to knock on the 220BHP door for the moment.

    I'll no doubt wide track the car, it seems silly not to. I can't think why in the world I'd want to be "scene" with a VR under the bonnet, it's there to be driven not looked at.

    Also, the NOISE. The sound of a 6 pot is pretty awesome.

    Just another question, I think I asked it and no one noticed, does anyone do anything with the angle of the engine in the bay to move it's weight back a little bit?
     
  16. StuMc

    StuMc Moderator and Regional Host - Manchester Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Likes Received:
    268
    Location:
    50? 20` 47 N - 06? 57` 57 E
    You mean in comparison to a 1.8t?

    It`d still cost you a bit to get 220 out of a VR...

    The ideal would be to tilt it back, obviously, but in fact it can foul the bonnet as it is, so most people cut down the mounts to get clearance. Not much scope for tilting it back.


    Pretty much every question you can come up with has been approached from every angle numerous times already... ;)
     
  17. RIP-MK3 Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    sunbury on thames
    not worth buying one ready made? there's a fair few knocking about now
     
  18. PhatVR6 Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Re: tilting it back.

    I looked at doing this, I tried rotating the engine back and fitting it on a 4 cylinder bell housing. problem is the end cover where the intermediate sprocket is eats into the bell housing/diff area.

    I looked to see if you could alter it but just couldn't work out a way of driving the cams without major major work.

    might just be possible in a fwd car, but the transfer box got in the way of the oil pump drive and cam chain cover on mine. i could have gotten around the oil pump drive by cutting it off and welding th block and dry sumping, but too much work.

    I've seem them fitted longitundinally, you can buy a bell housing adapter from the states to mount them to an audi box (I think) and run RWD.
     
  19. Matt82

    Matt82 Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    GTI Scene
    i had a quick think about tiling it yesterday... wouldnt that raise the COG of the lump?
     
  20. G-Man Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    By the petrol pump
    Thats what I did but found out lots of small issues I want to sort out to make it 100% perfect.

    Can't wait to get it back on the road as before it weighed 1060kg but now i've stripped it even more so hoping to crack the 1000kg barrier and whilst sorting out the engine with a bit of mild tuning and servicing to see at least 180hp :)
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice