8v and 16v torque

Discussion in 'Engines' started by deajam, Sep 7, 2004.

  1. deajam Forum Member

    Hello all. I want to finally get to the bottom of the whole thing and find out the truth about the torque characteristics of the 8v and 16v Mk2 engines. Does anyone have a graph of torque for these? Either on the same graph or seperate as I can traspose them on to the same graph and post it in this forum for all to share. I know the 16v has more torque overall but I think we all want to know what the comparrison is like through the entire rev range. Thanks. Ex Mk1 owner, soon to be Mk2 owner.
     
  2. edc1 Forum Member

    You're better off getting plots off the same rollers and better still on the same day too
     
  3. chrismc Forum Junkie

    A mk2 16v produces peak torque of around 124lbs/ft as standard whereas an 8v produces a peak figure of around 115lbs/ft for a later car...

    From experience the in-gear times are pretty similar up until around 5Krevs where the extra 30 or so BHP allows the 16v to stretch its legs...

    Up to this point the 8v is more or less a match. The fact that the 8v torque curve is very flat makes the car feel very punchy, if not out & out quick, hence the reason why some people prefer the 8vs relaxed driving manner & instant get up & go...
     
  4. rubjonny

    rubjonny Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Plus they're cheaper to insure which adds to the appeal :)

    Just drive both and decide what you prefer!
     
  5. edc1 Forum Member

    16v torque plot, might be a bit deceptively flat cos it starts at 2.3k but even looking at the scale and adjusting it is still pretty flat.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. deajam Forum Member

    Good idea about the same rolers and day. Any Roling road day graphs for standard cars would help if any one has them. Can't seem to find any Volkswagon graphs anywhere.
     
  7. Funkyfin2000 Forum Addict

    16v all the way for me, just love the revving...not so keen on the 8v just hasn't got the grunt that the 16v gives!
     
  8. b'locks Forum Addict

    16v for high speed driving, 8v for town.
     
  9. Tubthumped Forum Junkie

    2.0 16v and be happy! ;)
     
  10. mk1 dubba Forum Member

    2.0 8v best of both sorta thing
     
  11. fthaimike Forum Addict

    My 8v outpulls a lot of 16v's & also has the high speeds :lol:
     
  12. flusted Forum Member

    Got both,8v feels so slow compared to my valver
     
  13. DEX

    Dex Paid Member Paid Member



    even mine? ;)
     
  14. Yours is dead. Remove it from your sig at once and replace it with a picture of a small Japanese man. ;)
     
  15. ValverPaul Forum Member

    These two charts were taken on our RR Day (same day/same rollers) ;)
    16V played with a bit
    [​IMG]
    8V standard
    [​IMG]

    Edited by: ValverPaul
     
  16. fthaimike Forum Addict

    :lol: , i dont need to throttle mine to get power ;)
     
  17. buck4229 Forum Member

    The 8V will be more of a relaxed drive, where as the 16V will
    have to be worked hard but will be faster...

    This is only a general rule though, and my two penneth as I have
    both at the moment.
     
  18. H8SV8S Forum Member

    This is a never ending debate! I like the 16v but would love a spin in a nicely tuned 8v like fthaimike's or Chris's to see what it's like by comparison
     
  19. gorilly Forum Member

    hmm how about a 20v passat? ;)
     
  20. shaft69 Forum Member

    My 9a with flowed head, kr cams and powerflow exh produced 145ibft torque at near 6000rpm my old 8v with 2lt tsr oulton engine with webber twin choke, tsr 4 branch and mongoose system 159ibft at 4500ish. 8v came in more prominant than 16v, really could fell 8v kick in. Still prefer my 16v tho any time.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice