Latest Golf+ Mag

Discussion in 'General Vehicle Chat' started by Andy947, Jan 1, 2005.

  1. superden Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2003
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont get the whole `90 spec trim must be JUST SO` attitude [8-}]
     
  2. muppet Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    England
    Are you getting upset about people calling your big bumpers tacky?
     
  3. Seraph Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    -5129' 57N-07 29W
    my point!!
    other posts are saying without the 90trim the car is incomplete.
    So im asking..where is the line drawn?
    if the car has 90trim and funky mirrors, is it still ok,
    or do the addition of the mirrors then take the car back to unaccptable
    Mirrors was just an example. could be wheels,lights ect..
     
  4. N1CK Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hampshire
    Lets just settle this the old fashioned way with a;
    FIGHT!!!!!!
    :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  5. darrynK

    darrynK Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    54
    IMO, yes :)


    they didn't have arches either tho...

    to be fair, i think it's the thick strips i hate, not the fact they're on with big bumpers.
    even with my driver with small bumpers i was changing them to 90spec without arches and cl spatz.
    Edited by: darrynK
     
  6. Seraph Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    -5129' 57N-07 29W
    theres nothing to be settled n1ck, were defending the same point, more or less!!!im not even sure wot this 'debate' is about anymoe. Everyones saying something different! :lol:
     
  7. t_r_d Forum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United Kingdom
  8. t_r_d Forum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    f**k that pics a bit big [:s]

    :lol:
     
  9. darrynK

    darrynK Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    54
  10. stew72 Forum Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I'm with you mate [:D] aren't mk2's a bit gay anyhow? [:D]
     
  11. Joe16v Forum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Likes Received:
    17
    Location:
    Eastleigh
    I agree with Andy, it looks crap. Why bother
     
  12. m1xmag Forum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Likes Received:
    1
    "But IMO i know of at least half a dozen cars that deserve a feature in mags, but havent got one. "

    And there u have it.

    Golf mag does seem to have become very second rate to PVW recently but the twin G60'd Mk2 that was in the last mag was mental [:D]

    As for that red mk3....... DO NOT PASS GO, DO NOT COLLECT 200 POUNDS [xx(]
    Edited by: m1xmag
     
  13. Trev16v

    Trev16v Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    451
    Location:
    Oxfordshireland
    In my opinion, Golf+ and PVW should really stick to featuring standard Oak Green MK2s and nothing else.
     
  14. m1xmag Forum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Likes Received:
    1
    yeah it could be renamed Oak VW+ :lol:

    Looking forward to 100th issue of PVW - should be some nice cars.

    Off to get my latest Golf mag - so I can pass judgement on it properly :lol:
     
  15. lowrider Forum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Great Britain
    When i put pics of my old MK2 up on here in this guise:
    [​IMG]
    Some loved it, some hated it, yet when i put it up like this:
    [​IMG]
    I didn't get any negative comments. Seems to me some people in the 'scene' just don't like anything thats different [:x]

    Not saying i like the MK3, not my cup of tea, but its how he wanted his car to be, which is what its all about. Doing things that YOU want to do, not what other people THINK you should
     
  16. Deako Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    133
    Location:
    ReddiWraps
    Cause the graphics down the side of the car were poo! ;) :lol:
     
  17. Andy947 Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    Scotland, Aberdeen
    Some people really are BLOODY STUPID!!!!


    The point was, the car shouldn't have been in the mag. [:[] :clap:
     
  18. Dubya Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Ghettos of Coventry
    Um. GRP = Glass Reinforced Plastic
     
  19. Quiksilver

    Quiksilver Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    England

    I agree.

    Big Bumpers and 90 spec looks mint.

    Big Bumpers and Bigger side trim looks as good..

    At least T_R_D isnt making his Car in to a GTI copy by adding the GTI Trim.

    As its been said that MK3 is Gash and i think it shouldnt been in the mag.
     
  20. Yorkie Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm glad you've finally admitteed that to yourself.

    So why did you start a thread...
    "Why is that raft o pooe MK3 1.4 in it"

    and not start it like this
    "Is it me or has the standard of cars featured in the Golf+ mag, gone downhill?"

    Cheers, Jamie
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice