Running a VR6 turbo?

Discussion in 'Turbocharged, Supercharged or Nitrous !' started by LregG, Oct 26, 2011.

  1. coullstar Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Scotland
    Dont dismiss these. That what was originally fitted to mine and it worked fine until the oil feed line burst. That was with a 1.06 hot side and it bloody flew. I can see folk not wanting to pay big buck for a turbo but when you get the like of a Garrett ball bearing you realise where the extra money goes.
     
  2. LregG

    LregG Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I'd love a GT30...unless I get a second job or win some money then it really is a pipe dream for the moment
     
  3. sambo Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Likes Received:
    441
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    My Gt3040R will be coming off soon and becoming spare if you really must have one ;)
     
  4. RBPE Forum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    The spacer plate, rod bolts and head studs route seems to be popular and handles plenty of power. Lugnuts got Tim Mullens to be ultra reliable on standard pistons and rods (mk3 dozens of ten second runs and abuse 511whp@20psi - 10.02@152mph, dyno looks sweet on Precision 6265 T4).
    ARP studs are the ones to get, take into account the spacer route xtra height where Racewear do not according to some VRT owners (not used them on VR myself) and are easy to adjust.
    Few different spacers about from 7.5 to 9.5:1 depending on thickness.
    Rod bolts/Spacer/Gaskets/Head studs wil probably set you back around 300-400 so might be an idea to just chuck a spacer on and some peeps buy a 2nd hand engine to strip, check and add those (of course you generally know your VR so it's a gamble). With older engines you'll also need the usual rings, gaskets, belts, bearings etc and check bore wear, alignment etc.
    Regarding turbo, what about a Garrett journal bearing, can upgrade to BB later. No one seems to mention the T3 or T4/60-1 and T4/T61's, great turbo's for VR's and around 500-650 so about half of DBB. Did you get a cheapy copy turbo? Opinion is divided on these, seems poor metal dont like any decent boost (1bar+) and blades bend and crack but some have been known to be okay for 20k+ miles, bit of a gamble it seems (was looking into using one myself in the past but couldn't bring myself to do it).
    I'd get a 0.82 in T3 and 0.68 in T4 & wouldn't go below 45lbs min flow rate for the turbo as a well tuned 2.8 running 97%VE and 7krpm should hit 50lbs at around 1.1bar.

    T3 turbines you will be looking at around 1bar+ at approx:
    0.63 - 3000-3200rpm
    0.82 - 3400-3600rpm
    1.06 - 3800-4000rpm
    Positive manifold pressure is around 2-3k , T3 0.82 should get you +psi at around 2500rpm on 2.8 depending on turbine and a few other variables.
    Heard the larger T4 0.68 turbines (undiv) pretty much match the 0.82 for spool at similar boost but yet to try one on a VR, was talking to a USRT guy and he swears by a T4 turbine on a VR6.
    Inlet mani's have been known to pop over 10psi so most upgrade to SRI mani and for RHD cars you'll generally want to run an underslung FI exhaut mani like SPA to avoid inlet mani probs like heat soak/turbo in way etc on std inlet manifold.
    Watch for back pressure on exhaust side due to VR unequal length design, 3" seems to be best for DP/Exhaust rather than 2.5" on a typical 55-65lbs/min tubby. Never heard anyone complain about a loud VRT! [:D]

    Did a few calcs about required boost pressures a while back as a rough guide to choosing turbo:
    2.8, 97%VE and 95degF IA temp @ sea level, 7krpm max I think it was:
    50lbs = 30.58MAP = 16psi/1.1bar boost
    55lbs = 33.60MAP = 19psi/1.3bar boost
    60lbs = 36.70MAP = 22psi/1.5bar boost
    70lbs = 42.8MAP = 28psi/1.9bar boost
    80lbs = 48.9MAP = 34psi/2.3bar boost

    3.0ltr:
    60lbs = 34.2MAP = 19.5psi/1.3bar boost
    70lbs = 39.9MAP = 25psi/1.7bar boost
    80lbs = 45.7MAP = 31psi/2.1bar boost

    Lots of variables but to get from lbs/min times by 10 for general HP guide, 9 would be an inefficient engine and 11 a well tuned example.

    Hope this helps anyone interested :thumbup:
     
  5. Matt82

    Matt82 Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    GTI Scene
    Paair of ko3 pounds quite fun. If they normally have headroom for 200bhp then a pair should be sufficient. Controlling the boost/torque delivery could be fun though
     
  6. LregG

    LregG Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    The turbo I have is a copy and exhaust manifold is an ATP copy.

    the turbo specs are...

    GT3582 copy

    Cold side uses a 66.6mm compressor wheel and a 0.70 housing
    Hot side uses a 61.4mm turbine wheel and a 0.63 housing
    Divided T3 exhaust flange
    360 degree bearing

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    A bit too big for 350-400bhp?
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2011
  7. coullstar Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Scotland
    Thats like the original turbo that was fitted to my old car, worked okay. It had a 1.06 hot side. Came on boost around 3500rpm and I ran it with 17psi. It certianly flew.
    Here it is next to the pukka GT3582r that replaced it. You can see the smaller exhaust housing on the genuine item.
    [​IMG]
     
  8. tshirt2k

    tshirt2k Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Likes Received:
    325
    Location:
    Herts
    All you can do is try it. See how it goes. you can always turn the boost down.
     
  9. LregG

    LregG Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    so, in theory, my turbo shoulld spool earlier due to the 0.63 hotside?
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2011
  10. coullstar Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Scotland
    With a 0.63 housing it will spool quite low I would have thought, probably about 2750 - 3000rpm. I would find that a bit too low, the 0.82 was a good comprimise. You can get the cheap manual boost controllers linked to a low wastegate spring i.e. 0.5bar that will allow you to change the boost easily. Crude but it worked perfectly fine with mine.
     
  11. LregG

    LregG Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    i would like to use a Apexi AVC-R for its engine rpm Vs Psi capability for each gear (a feature i never got round to using on the beige beast)
     
  12. lewp91 Forum Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
    question regards to the spacer plate... do you need a slightly longer timing chain to do this? or is it just a case of the tension-er acting as though the chain is fitted tighter?
     
  13. LregG

    LregG Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    the tensioner takes up the slack so will still do its job but just not as far out as before due to the head height increase of 2mm
     
  14. RBPE Forum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Demon Motorsport wastegates are supposed to be pretty good and decent price if your going external
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2011
  15. LregG

    LregG Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    thanks, they look good and go as low as 8psi

    Can anyone confirm that my hotside is of the T4 variety?
     
  16. Matt82

    Matt82 Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    GTI Scene
    No one considered rear mounted turbot?
     
  17. coullstar Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Scotland
    Do you mean remote placement? Seems popular in the states but its easy enough to fit one on a VR so no real need IMO.
     
  18. Matt82

    Matt82 Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    GTI Scene
    I was thinking in place of the middle box
     
  19. LregG

    LregG Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I really can't see any gain from this apart from lowering under bonnet temps...lag will increase and the oil return would be a nightmare!

    There is barely enough room for a 3" exhaust let alone a turbo
     
  20. RBPE Forum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    RE: Your PM Lreg - did you buy this off some bloke then I take it? I bet it's one of the ones I was looking at a bit back, the 0.82 divided autoshop spesh although ind/exd diameters different to that which you've said.

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/gt35-T3-f...r_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3cbdd091b7

    Is that not an open flange mani and divided turbo? This can make spool worse due to turbulence. Peeps mainly use a tubular to match the ports/combustion cycle to each side but some have be known to file down the divide to reduce this when using a cast/log type.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2011

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice