60-100mph

Discussion in 'Engines' started by Matt82, Oct 15, 2006.

  1. Bundles Forum Junkie

    Yep, from all the yawning i was doing, your missus is crap at giving head.
     
  2. PAD

    Pad Forum Member

    bwaoarhahahhahaha! :lol:
     
  3. S1MMA Forum Member

    nice comback!

    so, 3 door or 5 door, which is best? And 8v vs 16v, which is best?
     
  4. Bundles Forum Junkie

    My opinion?

    Mk1 and mk2 = 3 door, but i prefer mk3's in 5 door, hence why i bought one, plus i have a kiddie to be putting in the back. :)

    16v owns the 8v in all areas imo, but cost more to buy, run, insure and fix. :thumbup:

    Put another way, my next Mk3, if get another, would be a 5 door 16v (because the VR6 kicks ass but is to thirsty for the milage i do.)
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2006
  5. Mark16v Forum Member

    According to Celtic Tuning my HDi 206 will do it in 24 seconds. Thats comical [:$] :lol:
     
  6. Bundles Forum Junkie

    My 8v might be able to keep up with that :p
     
  7. Admin Guest

    Just time my 8v MK2, did it in around 12sec - I used fourth gear and at 100mph it's just under 6k rpm thats getting close to the red line.

    I don't think using 3rd would have been any quicker. ( beacase of the gear change).
     
  8. fthaimike Forum Addict

    5 doors are heavier.........
     
  9. nutter4x4 Paid Member Paid Member

    5.65 in 4th
     
  10. PPP

    ppp In Delete Queue

    thats quick what mods ???
     
  11. RichS

    RichS CGTI Regional Host

    Matt's (lairy_1 on here) Mk1 G60 running approx 200bhp
    Early Mk1 1.6 GTI gearbox - very short ratios
    13"x8" wheels with 195/45 tyres (giving about 86% rolling radius)
    No rear seats, but rear cage + us two (big!) blokes
    Pretty consistent 6.8 seconds in 5th, from indicated 60 to indicated 110 - thought we'd play safe and go lower to higher because of tyres. (Actually works out as an indicated 52-95 if it had 'normal' tyre size. Just worked out that we should try again from indicated 70-115 to more accurately take account of tyres. Doh!)
     
  12. GVK

    GVK Paid Member Paid Member

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Bloody old VR6s, rubbish.. ;)
     
  13. Seany Forum Member

    Here is my stats according to that calculator although 4.83 to 60 seems a bit optermistic due to traction loss [:$]
    Also, dunno the difference in weight of my TT lump and the 8v lump used to quote book weights.
    Will try soon as it stops bloody rainin and the road is dry!! [:s]
    Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 252
    Weight without Driver (KG) : 980
    Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 261.27
    0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.83
    0 - 100 (Secs) : 11.42
    60 - 100 (Secs) : 6.59
    Quarter Mile (Secs) : 13.18
    Terminal Speed (MPH) : 107.41
    Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.98
    Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 109.40
     
  14. mr hillclimber Club GTI Supporter and Sponsor

    I know it's an oldy (the thread and the car) but 7.64 from the Mk1 today, I'm sure it'll do better when back on Optimax... :lol:
     
  15. dubst16v Forum Member

    Finally got a chance to have a go at this.
    my 2.0 16v mk2 managed
    9.2 secs did have 3 people in the car at the time but still seemed a little sluggish??
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice