60-100mph

Discussion in 'Engines' started by Matt82, Oct 15, 2006.

  1. Bundles Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Aberdeenshire
    Yep, from all the yawning i was doing, your missus is crap at giving head.
     
  2. PAD

    Pad Forum Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brighton
    bwaoarhahahhahaha! :lol:
     
  3. S1MMA Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2003
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    nice comback!

    so, 3 door or 5 door, which is best? And 8v vs 16v, which is best?
     
  4. Bundles Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Aberdeenshire
    My opinion?

    Mk1 and mk2 = 3 door, but i prefer mk3's in 5 door, hence why i bought one, plus i have a kiddie to be putting in the back. :)

    16v owns the 8v in all areas imo, but cost more to buy, run, insure and fix. :thumbup:

    Put another way, my next Mk3, if get another, would be a 5 door 16v (because the VR6 kicks ass but is to thirsty for the milage i do.)
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2006
  5. Mark16v Forum Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    According to Celtic Tuning my HDi 206 will do it in 24 seconds. Thats comical [:$] :lol:
     
  6. Bundles Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Aberdeenshire
    My 8v might be able to keep up with that :p
     
  7. Admin Guest

    Just time my 8v MK2, did it in around 12sec - I used fourth gear and at 100mph it's just under 6k rpm thats getting close to the red line.

    I don't think using 3rd would have been any quicker. ( beacase of the gear change).
     
  8. fthaimike Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Likes Received:
    12
    5 doors are heavier.........
     
  9. nutter4x4 Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Lao Peoples Dem. Rep.
    5.65 in 4th
     
  10. PPP

    ppp In Delete Queue

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Likes Received:
    0
    thats quick what mods ???
     
  11. RichS

    RichS CGTI Regional Host

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Shepshed
    Matt's (lairy_1 on here) Mk1 G60 running approx 200bhp
    Early Mk1 1.6 GTI gearbox - very short ratios
    13"x8" wheels with 195/45 tyres (giving about 86% rolling radius)
    No rear seats, but rear cage + us two (big!) blokes
    Pretty consistent 6.8 seconds in 5th, from indicated 60 to indicated 110 - thought we'd play safe and go lower to higher because of tyres. (Actually works out as an indicated 52-95 if it had 'normal' tyre size. Just worked out that we should try again from indicated 70-115 to more accurately take account of tyres. Doh!)
     
  12. GVK

    GVK Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2003
    Likes Received:
    590
    Location:
    Lincs.
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Bloody old VR6s, rubbish.. ;)
     
  13. Seany Forum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Here is my stats according to that calculator although 4.83 to 60 seems a bit optermistic due to traction loss [:$]
    Also, dunno the difference in weight of my TT lump and the 8v lump used to quote book weights.
    Will try soon as it stops bloody rainin and the road is dry!! [:s]
    Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 252
    Weight without Driver (KG) : 980
    Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 261.27
    0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.83
    0 - 100 (Secs) : 11.42
    60 - 100 (Secs) : 6.59
    Quarter Mile (Secs) : 13.18
    Terminal Speed (MPH) : 107.41
    Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.98
    Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 109.40
     
  14. mr hillclimber Club GTI Supporter and Sponsor

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Likes Received:
    145
    Location:
    Southwest
    I know it's an oldy (the thread and the car) but 7.64 from the Mk1 today, I'm sure it'll do better when back on Optimax... :lol:
     
  15. dubst16v Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Finally got a chance to have a go at this.
    my 2.0 16v mk2 managed
    9.2 secs did have 3 people in the car at the time but still seemed a little sluggish??
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice